ניתוח מחזור חיים חשמל בישראל 220709

  • Published on
    18-May-2015

  • View
    839

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

, , "

Transcript

  • 1. '20092192 // - : " : , , : ' , ' , "

2. 3.

  • ( " )
  • -
  • 1
  • 1

4. LCA

    • :
  • - :

5.

    • :
    • ,
  • :

6. 8 7. 8. 9 9.

  • 8
  • 9

10.

  • [1] Israeli Electric Company statistical report 2007
  • [2] Dolev S, Energy conservation vs. coal power plant, 2007, Israeli forum for energy
  • [3] Espey JA, Espey M, (2004) Turning on the Lights: A Meta-analysis of Residential Electricity Demand Elasticities,Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics36:1, pp. 65-81
  • [4] http:// www.ecoinvent.org

11. ( ) [5]http://www.pre.nl/eco-indicator99/default.htm [6]Baroni L, Cenci L, Tettamanti M, Berati M, Evaluating the environmental impact of various dietary patterns combined with different food production systems [7] Ruether JA, Ramezan M, Balash, Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Coal Gasification Power Generation Systems 12. 13. 30% 8% 14. % % = : 0.2- - 0.4- [5] 15. Eco-indicator 99[6] 16. Eco-indicator 99 - [3] 17. 18.

  • And finally, the annual operation of the plant would release about 40 times more GWP than construction.Thus, in the course of the complete life cycle of a plant, assumed 30 years in this study, the contribution to GWP by construction and demolition would be negligible compared to emissions from operation (Ruether et al).

[4] 19. 20.

  • - 99
  • - LCA , . .

21. Eco-indicator 99