ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΙΣΜΟΣ Κ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΚΡΙΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΠΛΕΥΡΑ ΤΩΝ ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΩΝ

  • Published on
    29-Jul-2015

  • View
    598

  • Download
    7

Embed Size (px)

Transcript

<p> :2011-12 .. 7509 16/1/2012</p> <p>T 1. 2. 3. .............................................................................................2 ......................................................................................2 ..............................................................................................2 3.2 ...............................................................................4 3.3 .........................5 3.4 ;.................................5 3.5 ..............................................................6 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ................................................................................................7 ......................................................................................7 ........................................................................................23 .........................................................................24 .......................................................................................25</p> <p>3.1....................................................................................2</p> <p>1. , . , , . , , . , . , . , .</p> <p>2. 50 ,, , . , , . Liket, , , , .</p> <p>3. , ( , ) .</p> <p>3.1, . , . . , . , , , .. , . . . . . " " . (marketing) . . , , . , . , , </p> <p> . , , , , , . . , . , [[], . , , . (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I43snmkgMgI) , (CLC) , / ( ) ( ) . , , - . (Kaufmann &amp; channon 1973,Straver 1977,Aaker 1978,Kaynak 1985). , Tansou Banker 2007 , 1/3 . , . , , . (Barrutia &amp; Charterins 2006,Mackay 2008,Smith 2004, Stolie et al.2005).</p> <p>3.2 , , 29 2007-08. 1929 (The Great Depression) . 21 . " ", , 29 1929, . 2 , 1939. , . , , , . , . , - 40% 60%. , , , . . , . , , , 2 . 2007 . 78 1929 . . , </p> <p> , "" . , , . "", , , , .</p> <p>3.3 . .</p> <p>3.4 ; . . . . .2009, 8,5%. . , . . . ; . .</p> <p>, , . . , , . , .( http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=MIFGfgKHrwU&amp;feature=player_embedded#! ) . . . , ' , , , , .</p> <p>3.5 , "Sheconomics", Live Science. . (75%) , (79%) ! 40% , 60% " ", . , " ". ( ), - - .</p> <p> . 6% 5,5% "" /. "" , . , , , . , , , , ! , . 25% , , , , . ' ; ( -)</p> <p>4., , , , . , , , , , . , , .</p> <p>5. 50 , 24 , 26 . </p> <p> , . Liket, , , , . , (18-29,30-44,45-59,60 ). : , , .. . , spss, excel, . .</p> <p> ; Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Total 2 7 10 19 12 50 4,0 14,0 20,0 38,0 24,0 100,0 4,0 14,0 20,0 38,0 24,0 100,0 4,0 18,0 38,0 76,0 100,0</p> <p> , 38,8% . , , . , 30-44, 10 50 , 6 45-49. , , </p> <p> .t1 * t75 Crosstabulation t75 t1 Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Total Count % of Total 1 2,0% 2 4,0% 6 12,0% 7 14,0% 8 16,0% 24 48,0% N 1 2,0% 5 10,0% 4 8,0% 12 24,0% 4 8,0% 26 52,0% 2 4,0% 7 14,0% 10 20,0% 19 38,0% 12 24,0% 50 100,0% Total</p> <p>t1 * t76 Crosstabulation t76 1 t1 Count % within t1 % within t76 Count % within t1 % within t76 Count % within t1 % within t76 Count % within t1 % within t76 Count % within t1 % within t76 Total Count % within t1 % within t76 2 4,0% 100,0% 17 34,0% 100,0% 21 42,0% 100,0% 10 20,0% 100,0% 50 100,0% 100,0% 0 ,0% ,0% 4 33,3% 23,5% 6 50,0% 28,6% 2 16,7% 20,0% 12 100,0% 24,0% 2 10,5% 100,0% 10 52,6% 58,8% 4 21,1% 19,0% 3 15,8% 30,0% 19 100,0% 38,0% 0 ,0% ,0% 2 20,0% 11,8% 5 50,0% 23,8% 3 30,0% 30,0% 10 100,0% 20,0% 0 ,0% ,0% 1 14,3% 5,9% 4 57,1% 19,0% 2 28,6% 20,0% 7 100,0% 14,0% 0 ,0% ,0% 2 0 ,0% ,0% 3 2 100,0% 9,5% 4 0 ,0% ,0% Total 2 100,0% 4,0%</p> <p> Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent</p> <p>Valid</p> <p> 5 Total</p> <p>12</p> <p>24,0</p> <p>24,0</p> <p>24,0</p> <p>14</p> <p>28,0</p> <p>28,0</p> <p>52,0</p> <p>11</p> <p>22,0</p> <p>22,0</p> <p>74,0</p> <p>10 3 50</p> <p>20,0 6,0 100,0</p> <p>20,0 6,0 100,0</p> <p>94,0 100,0</p> <p> , 28% , 4 .</p> <p>Cumulative Frequency Valid 5000 5000-12000 12000-20000 20000-30000 Total 2 21 12 11 4 50 Percent 4,0 42,0 24,0 22,0 8,0 100,0 Valid Percent 4,0 42,0 24,0 22,0 8,0 100,0 Percent 4,0 46,0 70,0 92,0 100,0</p> <p> , . , , 18-29 5000 , 2 50 4 50000. , , .</p> <p> , density, , 18-29, 45-49.</p> <p> ;</p> <p>Frequency</p> <p>Percent</p> <p>Valid Percent</p> <p>Cumulative Percent</p> <p>Valid</p> <p> Total</p> <p>3 17 11 14 5 50</p> <p>6,0 34,0 22,0 28,0 10,0 100,0</p> <p>6,0 34,0 22,0 28,0 10,0 100,0</p> <p>6,0 40,0 62,0 90,0 100,0</p> <p>Frequency</p> <p>Percent</p> <p>Valid Percent</p> <p>Cumulative Percent</p> <p>Valid</p> <p> Total</p> <p>3 18 13 14 2 50</p> <p>6,0 36,0 26,0 28,0 4,0 100,0</p> <p>6,0 36,0 26,0 28,0 4,0 100,0</p> <p>6,0 42,0 68,0 96,0 100,0</p> <p>Frequency</p> <p>Percent</p> <p>Valid Percent</p> <p>Cumulative Percent</p> <p>Valid</p> <p> Total</p> <p>2 23 10 11 4 50</p> <p>4,0 46,0 20,0 22,0 8,0 100,0</p> <p>4,0 46,0 20,0 22,0 8,0 100,0</p> <p>4,0 50,0 70,0 92,0 100,0</p> <p> Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Total 4 11 7 20 8 50 8,0 22,0 14,0 40,0 16,0 100,0 8,0 22,0 14,0 40,0 16,0 100,0 8,0 30,0 44,0 84,0 100,0</p> <p>Frequency</p> <p>Percent</p> <p>Valid Percent</p> <p>Cumulative Percent</p> <p>Valid</p> <p>1</p> <p>2,0</p> <p>2,0</p> <p>2,0</p> <p> Total</p> <p>7 8 17 17 50</p> <p>14,0 16,0 34,0 34,0 100,0</p> <p>14,0 16,0 34,0 34,0 100,0</p> <p>16,0 32,0 66,0 100,0</p> <p> , 46 50 2 , . , 40 50 , , , , , , .. 68 % 34% (+34%), , ( t11, t 12,t13,t14). ( ) </p> <p> , , , , . , , .</p> <p> t10 t15 Total 3 17 11 14 5 50 2 9 10 10 4 35 1 8 1 4 1 15 Total</p> <p> t11 t15 Total 3 18 13 14 2 50 2 13 8 10 2 35 1 5 5 4 0 15 Total</p> <p> t12 t15 Total 2 23 10 11 4 50 2 13 9 7 4 35 0 10 1 4 0 15 Total</p> <p>t13 t15 Total 4 11 7 20 8 4 8 4 13 6 0 3 3 7 2</p> <p>Total</p> <p>15</p> <p>35</p> <p>50</p> <p> t14 t15 1 1 5 6 2 15 Total</p> <p> Total</p> <p>0</p> <p>6</p> <p>3</p> <p>11</p> <p>15</p> <p>35</p> <p>1</p> <p>7</p> <p>8</p> <p>17</p> <p>17</p> <p>50</p> <p> 16 , , .</p> <p> Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Total 1 5 10 23 11 50 2,0 10,0 20,0 46,0 22,0 100,0 2,0 10,0 20,0 46,0 22,0 100,0 2,0 12,0 32,0 78,0 100,0</p> <p> Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 4 8,0 8,0 8,0</p> <p> Total</p> <p>15 20 11</p> <p>30,0 40,0 22,0</p> <p>30,0 40,0 22,0</p> <p>38,0 78,0 100,0</p> <p>50</p> <p>100,0</p> <p>100,0</p> <p> Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Total 50 100,0 100,0 7 12 16 15 14,0 24,0 32,0 30,0 14,0 24,0 32,0 30,0 14,0 38,0 70,0 100,0</p> <p> Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Total 50 100,0 100,0 8 12 10 15 5 16,0 24,0 20,0 30,0 10,0 16,0 24,0 20,0 30,0 10,0 16,0 40,0 60,0 90,0 100,0</p> <p>Frequency</p> <p>Percent</p> <p>Valid Percent</p> <p>Cumulative Percent</p> <p>Valid</p> <p> Total</p> <p>5 13 11 17 4</p> <p>10,0 26,0 22,0 34,0 8,0</p> <p>10,0 26,0 22,0 34,0 8,0</p> <p>10,0 36,0 58,0 92,0 100,0</p> <p>50</p> <p>100,0</p> <p>100,0</p> <p> Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Total 50 100,0 100,0 1 7 10 22 10 2,0 14,0 20,0 44,0 20,0 2,0 14,0 20,0 44,0 20,0 2,0 16,0 36,0 80,0 100,0</p> <p> t17 N Valid Marketing Std. Deviation Variance Range 50 0 ,981 ,962 4 t18 50 0 ,894 ,798 3 t19 50 0 1,036 1,073 3 t20 50 0 1,268 1,609 4 t22 50 0 1,160 1,345 4 t23 50 0 1,022 1,045 4</p> <p>Percentiles</p> <p>25 50 75</p> <p>3,00 4,00 4,00</p> <p>3,00 4,00 4,00</p> <p>3,00 4,00 5,00</p> <p>2,00 3,00 4,00</p> <p>2,00 3,00 4,00</p> <p>3,00 4,00 4,00</p> <p>, , . , . ( ). , . ( 57)</p> <p>A , , , , .</p> <p>6., , , , . </p> <p> - . - , , , , . , , , , . , , , -, - . , , , , : , , , - . , , , , , . , , . , , .</p> <p>7. , . , , , , </p> <p> , , , , , . , , , .</p> <p>8.</p> <p>- : ( ) WHAT PRICE (C.P. HARRIS) CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARD COUNTERFEITS (Celso Augusto de Matos, from Journal of Consumer Marketing. CONSUMER MISBEHAVIOR: WHY PEOPLE BUY ILLICIT GOODS (Albers-Miller, N.D. from Journal of Consumer Marketing vol.16 no.3 pp.273-87. CONSUMERISM AND ETHICAL ATTITUDES: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY (ABAS J.ALI &amp; M.WISNIESK) CONSUMERISM AS AN ELEMENT OF ON-GOING SOCIAL CHANGE( LAYTON &amp; HOLMS) CONSUMERISM IN NEW ZEALAND( TANSU BARKER) MEASURING CONSUMER SATISFACTION WITH CONSUMER PROTECTION AGENCIES SOME INSIGHTS FROM SAUDI ARABIA(AL GAMDI,SADIQ SOHEIL) WIKIPEDIA VLIORAS.GR</p>

Recommended

View more >