ДИНАМИКА ФУНКЦИОНАЛЬНОГО СОСТОЯНИЯ ФИЗИОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ СИСТЕМ ОРГАНИЗМА ДОШКОЛЬНИКОВ В ПРОЦЕССЕ РАБОТЫ НА КОМПЬЮТЕРЕ

  • Published on
    04-Apr-2017

  • View
    226

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Transcript

  • - 102 -

    -

    -

    .. 1, ..

    , ,

    -

    6 7 . -

    -

    -

    - -

    .

    : , 6 7 , , ,

    .

    Dynamics of functional state of physiological systems in preschool children when

    working at the computer. The more expressed reactivity to computer work was found in

    6-7-year-old girls in comparison with the boys of the same age. The aim was to study

    the dynamics of functional state in children working at the computer depending on their

    health and gender-age status. The study showed the importance of individual approach

    when rating and organizing computer work with preschool children.

    Key words: work at the compute, 6-7-year-old children, boys, girls, health groups.

    ,

    , , .

    .

    , -

    .

    , ,

    -

    ( , , .), -

    ,

    [15, 19-22].

    -

    .

    -

    , -

    :1 .. , E-mail:

  • - 103 -

    : ,

    , -

    ; , ;

    , -

    .

    -

    () , -

    ,

    ( -

    ). ,

    . -

    -

    , (, ), -

    . ,

    (, ,

    , ,

    ),

    .

    . -

    30

    6 I-II , . , 15-

    , ,

    [9].

    . ,

    , ,

    ,

    .

    .

    -

    ,

    [11].

    ,

    . , ,

    , -

    ,

    , , -

    , ;

    ;

    5-6

  • - 104 -

    ;

    , -

    [17].

    .

    5-6

    , , .

    ,

    ,

    . ,

    ,

    5-6 : ,

    , , ( ), -

    .

    -

    : , , .

    -

    ,

    , ,

    , (48%). ,

    (51%) -

    , : . 33%

    16% . -

    (47%)

    . ,

    -

    .

    .

    , , -

    , . ,

    III ,

    309 4,9 320

    4,5 , I II , -

    ( 35,8% 23,3% 30,8%) -

    (40 % 20% 25%),

    . -

    I, II III

    13,3%, 20,0% 36,7% (

    10,0%). I II

    .

    .

    , III , I

    II ; (6,7%),

    I II .

  • - 105 -

    ,

    -

    . , ,

    III 80% -

    -

    . ,

    .

    -

    (III ). I, II III

    7%, 7% 14% .

    ,

    , -

    III . -

    .

    [13].

    , I II

    ,

    14 . III

    : 9-

    , ; 10- -

    ( , ), -

    , , ,

    . (

    15-

    ) III -

    99% 72%.

    , 6- -

    III 15-

    , .

    -

    . , 15-

    6- I-II

    .

    -

    -

    .

    6 7 ,

    -. , 6 7 -

    - . -

    6 7 . 5-6

    , 7-

    [14]. 6-

    , -

    , 7 . 7- -

    -

    .

  • - 106 -

    ,

    (, , ) -

    6 7 .

    1565 1653 .

    . 6-7 I-II , -

    - 40 .

    ,

    . .

    .

    -

    6 -

    :

    -

    . -

    -

    -

    , . -

    35% 25% , -

    , 48,8% 62,7%.

    -

    7 , -

    16 (0,05),

    .

    , .

    - 7 ,

    . -

    59,0 , 39,2% (

    20% ).

    5,9% , 17,9% (

    13%).

    35,8% , 23,5%.

    , -

    - -

    -

    , .

    .

    48,5%, 30,9%

    20,6%, .

    -

    , , -

    : 30,4.

    .

    (50%),

  • - 107 -

    39,3%.

    (41,2%), 28,5% .

    ,

    , -

    .

    .

    -

    , . -

    -

    :

    -

    - .

    6

    ,

    6

    . ,

    .

    ( 1,1 ,

    0,05; 1.0 , 0,05)

    .

    .

    . -

    . -, , -

    , , -

    , -

    15,4% ( 15%). -,

    , -

    .

    , , -

    -

    , -

    (..

    ). . ,

    -

    . , -

    .

    , -

    ,

    , .

    ( 1,3 ,

    0,05 1,0 , 0,05; 1,4 , 0,05 1,2 , 0,05).

    :

    ( 2 ) . -

    , . -

  • - 108 -

    -

    , .

    ,

    , ( -

    2 15% ( ) 4,4% ( ); -

    2 17,8% ( ).

    7

    .

    (-

    1,3 ,

  • - 109 -

    , 6

    ,

    6- : -

    ( 1,1 ./100 .,

  • - 110 -

    ( 48%).

    -

    , -

    .

    7 -

    , ,

    , (, 31,51,68

    86,112,9 25,71,8 67,110,8). , ,

    , : 0,710,014 0,670,017.

    12,20,51,

    9,50,95%, (

  • - 111 -

    -

    , [12]. -

    6 [18].

    . [16] -

    , ; 7-

    0,74 (), 1,08 ,

    2,01 . 10 .

    .. .. -

    .

    [7] ,

    , .

    , 8- -

    ( 15,4 29,8%),

    28,7 22,6%, , .

    , 7- -

    [3]. 7-17 . , -

    -

    50-70% .

    ( 30% -

    ) 7-8 11-13 .

    , 11-13 .

    ,

    , . , ..

    .. [4] ,

    7- -

    , ( 1,6 1,3 ).

    . , 6

    7

    ( , , -

    ) .

    ,

    -

    6- , 7-,

    . 7-

    6-

    , ,

    7 -

    .

    -

    . -

    -

    .

    , -

    , 7 .

  • - 112 -

    . -

    , -

    2

    .

    , .

    -

    ( 9,3% 6,9% ).

    . , -

    ( ) ,

    , .

    , ,

    .

    . , -

    , , , -

    .

    6 7

    , . ,

    15- -

    .

    -

    . ,

    , (25,71,8 67,110,8

    , 31,51,68 86,112,9). , ,

    , : 0,710,014 0,670,017.

    .

    ,

    , (

    14,3% , 8,3% ) 41,7% -

    28,5 % . -

    , -

    () . -

    5%,

    36% , .

    . , ..

    .. [8]

    .

    , -

    .

    ,

    .

    7 , -

    , -

    : -

    (5,9% 17,9%) (58,9%

  • - 113 -

    39,2%). -

    .

    .

    ,

    , ,

    ,

    . ,

    , . ,

    ().

    [5].

    -

    . -

    : 59% -

    , 39%. -

    : -

    59,9%, 35,7%.

    : 14,7%; 39,3%.

    , -

    ,

    . -

    , ,

    , .

    , , -

    -

    . -

    -

    6 7 . -

    , , , -

    , , ,

    , -

    .

    -

    .

    -

    - -

    .

    1. .., .., .. .

    //

    . ., 2000. . 57-58.

  • - 114 -

    2. .., .. - // . . 2005. 2. . 51-54.

    3. .., .. - //

    . ., 1985. . 46-47.

    4. .. .. - // .

    . . ., 1985. . 56.

    5. .., .. //

    . ., 1985. . 91.

    6. .., .. 7-8 - - // -

    . ., 1985. . 109-110.

    7. .. - //

    . ., 1985. . 119.

    8. .., .. - //

    . ., 1985. . 135-136.

    9. .., .., .. - 6 // V

    " ". ., 1999. . 159-160.

    10. .., .. 5-7 // . 2001. .27, 6. .

    23-28.

    11. .., .., .., .. -

    // -

    , 3, , 22-24 2009 . .: ,

    2009,. . 86-87.

    12. .., .. 70- // -

    . ., 1978. . 51-56.

    13. .. // : -

    . , 1997. . 5354.

    14. .. -. .:, 1979.-96.

    15. .., .., .. // . 2011. 8. .

    12-18.

    16. .., .., .. - //

    2007. 4. . 71-73.

  • - 115 -

    17. - , :

    - . .:

    ( 2.4.1.1249-03), 2003. 92 .

    18. .., .., .. - // -

    : . , 2002. . 313-314.

    19. Bener, A, et al. Do excessive internet use, television viewing and poor lifestyle habits affect low vision in school children? // Journal of child health care, 14 (4). 2010

    P. 375-385.

    20. Dankova, I School, children, computer and health // School and health 21(1), vols 1 and 2). - 2006 - P. 693-696.

    21. Johnson, GM Internet use and child development: validation of the ecological techno-subsystem // Educational technology & society, 13 (1). 2010. P. 176-185.

    22. Tomopoulos S, Valdez P, Dreyer BP, et al. Is exposure to media intended for pre-school children associated with less parent-child reading aloud and teaching activi-

    ties? Ambul Pediatr. 2007;7(1). P.1824.

    http://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=Q1kkcHfLa8MELe65Pel&uml_return_url=http%3A%2F%2Fpcs.isiknowledge.com%2Fuml%2Fuml_view.cgi%3Fproduct_sid%3DQ1kkcHfLa8MELe65Pel%26product%3DWOS%26marklist_id%3DWOS%26database_id%3DGB%26product_st_thomas%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Festi%252Eisiknowledge%252Ecom%253A8360%252Festi%252Fxrpc%26sort_opt%3DDate&action=retrieve&product=WOS&mode=FullRecord&viewType=fullRecord&frmUML=1&UT=000286296200007http://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=Q1kkcHfLa8MELe65Pel&uml_return_url=http%3A%2F%2Fpcs.isiknowledge.com%2Fuml%2Fuml_view.cgi%3Fproduct_sid%3DQ1kkcHfLa8MELe65Pel%26product%3DWOS%26marklist_id%3DWOS%26database_id%3DGB%26product_st_thomas%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Festi%252Eisiknowledge%252Ecom%253A8360%252Festi%252Fxrpc%26sort_opt%3DDate&action=retrieve&product=WOS&mode=FullRecord&viewType=fullRecord&frmUML=1&UT=000286296200007file:///D://School,%20children,%20computer%20and%20healthhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=Q1kkcHfLa8MELe65Pel&uml_return_url=http%3A%2F%2Fpcs.isiknowledge.com%2Fuml%2Fuml_view.cgi%3Fproduct_sid%3DQ1kkcHfLa8MELe65Pel%26product%3DWOS%26marklist_id%3DWOS%26database_id%3DGB%26product_st_thomas%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Festi%252Eisiknowledge%252Ecom%253A8360%252Festi%252Fxrpc%26sort_opt%3DDate&action=retrieve&product=WOS&mode=FullRecord&viewType=fullRecord&frmUML=1&UT=000274865500016http://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=Q1kkcHfLa8MELe65Pel&uml_return_url=http%3A%2F%2Fpcs.isiknowledge.com%2Fuml%2Fuml_view.cgi%3Fproduct_sid%3DQ1kkcHfLa8MELe65Pel%26product%3DWOS%26marklist_id%3DWOS%26database_id%3DGB%26product_st_thomas%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Festi%252Eisiknowledge%252Ecom%253A8360%252Festi%252Fxrpc%26sort_opt%3DDate&action=retrieve&product=WOS&mode=FullRecord&viewType=fullRecord&frmUML=1&UT=000274865500016

Recommended

View more >