социальное воздействие (Impact) измерение и управление

  • Published on
    14-Jun-2015

  • View
    341

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Transcript

<ul><li> 1. (IMPACT): : A Practical Guide to Measuring and Managing Impactby Dr L. Hehenberger, A.-M. Harling, P. Scholten, April 2013. EVPA. : 24 2014 . , - -, . </li></ul> <p> 2. 2 : ; ., : , . 3. 3 (impact): - ( ) 3. 4. 4 , (deal screening) ( 1) (due diligence) ( 2) (deal structuring) , . ( 3) , (investment management) . ( 4) (Exit) . ( 5) 5. 5 - , , . , , , , , - . , .- , , - . ( ) , ( ) (, ) 5 :(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) EVPA: () () EVPA:(1) (2) , 2 , .(1) EVPA(2) (1)- , (2) - (1) EVPA 2014(2) EPVA (1) 7 (2) 2014 6. 6 , , - 7. 7 (EVPA), 61 (90% 1 ) (outputs), (outcomes) (impact): 84% , 60% . . ( 70-90% 1-5). (53% ). ( ).: Hehenberger, L.; Harling, A. (2013) European Venture Philanthropy and Social Investment 2011/2012 EVPA 8. 8 (impact) (impact) , ( ) : , ( ) 9. 9 ( , ..) , , , ( , ) - ( ) (, ) , , , 10. 10. SMART 1. 11. 11 - , ( , ) , ! 12. 12. 1) ? ? ( ) ( ) , ( ) ( ) , , 13. 13 : (VPO/SI portfolio Managers): (VPO/SI portfolio managers, management,board of VPO/SI) : (VPO/SI portfolio managers and management): , (VPO/SI portfoliomanagers, management and board of VPO/SI) &amp; (SPO management) / : ( ) 14. 14. 2) ? (, , , ). , , ( , 3 6 .), ( )! " : . , : , , , , , . 15. 15. 3) ? ( , ): , ?4) : ? , 5) ? , 16. 17 , ? ( ; ; , ) ? ( , ) ? ? ( ; ) 17. 18 SMART , , , ( / ) 18. 19 , ; ; , 19. 20 2. 20. 21 .1) , () , , 2) . : , , : , 21. 22 1) 2) 22. 23 : , , ( ), - ( ) 23. 24 : 1 () : , , , , 24. 25 : 5-10 . , : ? ? - 25. 26 : 1. () 2. , , 3. 4. 5. 6. 654321 26. 27 . 1 , , 6 ( , ), . , , , .654321 27. 28 : 5-10 . : , ( ) ( 2 ) , 28. 29 . ( ) ( ( , , ..) , , , ( ) 29. 30 , , . , 30. 31 ( 1) (, , , ), () , - , 2 4 () . , , (, , , , ) 31. 32 3. 32. 33- , , . , , , , , - .. , ..- , , - .. ( ) , ( ) (, ) 5 :(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) EVPA: () () EVPA:(1) (2) , 2 , .(1) EVPA(2) (1)- , (2) - (1) EVPA 2014(2) EPVA (1) 7 (2) 2014 33. 34 : , , . ( , , ) , , . . 34. 35 . ( Impetus Trust Impact Report 2010-2011) , . , . , , 35. 36 : 25% , 25% , , , , 36. 37 , - - 37. 38 , ( ) , . , . . 38. 39 4. 39. 40 () . , (). ? , ? ? , , 40. 41 . ( ) , , (, , ) 41. 42 . , 42. 43 / () () ? 43. 44 ( ). ( ) 44. 45 ( ) 45. 46 ( , , ..) ( , , ) , - 46. 47 , , , () - (Value Game) - ; (QALY) , ( , ) 47. 48 +- . , 48. 49 ( , - ..) . , .. . 20% , , (-) () (), 49. 50 1. - ( ) (the Value Game) , , 50. 51 2. / . . (QALY) . , . , 1 0 ( 0 ) 51. 52 , . . 5-7% . 52. 53 : ( ) 1 ( ) ( , ) , - 53. 54 5. 54. 55 , 55. 56 . : () / ( ) 56. 57 . : , 57. 58 . , , . 58. 59 ( 2) . (, ). 59. 60 . ., , , ( ) - , , - , . - ( ) 60. 61 - , , -, . - ( ) 61. 62 - . , ( 1) - ( 2) - , . ( 3) , . ( 4) . ( 5)</p>