методика New

  • Published on
    02-Jul-2015

  • View
    172

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Transcript

  • 1. I. ................................................................................................................. 3 II. .............................................................................. 3 ...................................................................................................... 14 ......................................................................................................... 18 ................................................................................... 19 AHP..................................................................................... 20 .......................................................... 38 ......................................................................... 47 2

2. I.1.- 2.- - 3. 1 . 4.I I. 1. 2. 3., 1Merriam-Webster3 3. . 4.= =1 , i- - i-=1 =1=-=-,| |=1- { ; } min, max, opt - 1) 5.4 4. the Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHPAHP .2 PEST-:(P)(E)(S)(T)P)2 Williams, Teresa The Business Approach to Training. Vermont: Gower Publishing Ltd. 19975 5. 1) Institutions - The Global Competitiveness Report 2009Economic F 3.2)3)-4. -,)4)(E) , . 1)2)3 http://www.transparency.org.ru/4 http://www.oecd.org 6 6. 3) . 5.4)(S):1).2)(Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, GEM)(T)-1)5 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, GEM)www.hse.ru 7 7. Infrastructure - The Global CompetitivenessReport,World Economic Forum. 2)Forbes.PEST-. , AHP n-11 11n 1 1n18 8. 1 = , i, j i- j-n(n-1)/2 . 6eigenvector) = ,Aeigenvalue). 6Saaty, Thomas L. A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. // Journal of Mathematical Psychology, issue 15, volume 3. 1977 9 9. (), I - n*n ,( )==0neigenvalues).n n n n==1=1 =1- 10 10. n A- - A (eigenvector). = complex)(real)(imaginary) + 1 2 =2 1 =0 Hermitian MathCad, MathLab, Stata - R,11 11. nosym